The cash – comprising $43.5 million, £27,800 and N23.2 million hidden inside Apartment 7B at Osborne Towers, Ikoyi – was uncovered by operatives of the EFCC on April 12
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission on Friday took charge of bank accounts operated by Nigeria’s foreign intelligence service, the National Intelligence Agency, the latest in a string of measures against the NIA in the wake of last month’s discovery of N13 billion in a Lagos apartment.
The cash – comprising $43.5 million, £27,800 and N23.2 million hidden inside Apartment 7B at Osborne Towers, Ikoyi – was uncovered by operatives of the EFCC on April 12.
The director general of the NIA, Ayodele Oke, admitted to PREMIUM TIMES the money belonged to his agency, and was later suspended from office.
Mr. Oke said the money was meant for multiple “covert projects” across the country. This newspaper published excerpts of letters between Mr. Oke and the National Security Adviser, Babagana Monguno, which showed the NSA knew about the operation beforehand. The letters also showed President Muhammadu Buhari was informed by the NSA.
Security sources however told PREMIUM TIMES on Friday that operatives of the anti-graft agency compelled the director of Finance and Administration of the NIA to hand over the accounts of the beleaguered agency to an Army officer attached to the Office of the National Security Adviser.
The EFCC designated Jaafaru Mohammed, a brigadier general in the Nigerian Army, to assume the position of the Director of Finance of the NIA and commence a holistic audit of the agency’s finances.
The development was the climax of a week-long prying operation which saw detectives from the anti-graft agency grill four senior officials of the NIA.
PREMIUM TIMES has withheld the names of all the NIA personnel in order not to compromise their identities.
Several sources told this newspaper that last week, the NSA made at least two attempts to impose Mr. Mohammed on the NIA as its new Director of Finance, but officials of the agency blocked him from resuming each time.
Following the rejection of Mr. Mohammed, the EFCC invited NIA’s Director of Finance and Administration and two officials from the same account department, PREMIUM TIMES learnt.
The officials were later released after hours of questioning.
Anti-graft operatives also visited the NIA Headquarters to interrogate some officials during the week, our sources said.
On Friday, the EFCC invited NIA’s Director of Finance and Administration and detained him for several hours. Later, anti-graft detectives took him back to the NIA Headquarters where he was compelled to hand over to Mr. Mohammed, PREMIUM TIMES understands.
Violating the law?
Although the new measures are in furtherance of the EFCC’s investigations of the N13 billion Ikoyi money, security officials have questioned their legality, given the special status accorded the NIA by the National Security Agencies Act of 2004, prohibiting interference in its financial dealings.
Section 12 (1) or the NIA Instrument No. 1 of 1999, provides that “The Director-General ( of the NIA ) is responsible to the President, Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces for the proper expenditure and accounting of all funds made available to the Agency from the security vote and any other source.”
Section 12 (2) of the NIA Instrument No. 1 of 1999 provides the only accounting method which the NIA must follow: “The accounts of the National Intelligence Agency shall not be subject to external audit but the Director-General shall, by the first week of March each year, render to the President, Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, certificates showing the total sums expended during the preceding period and the main heading under which the expenditure was made and copy the National Security Adviser.”
Legally, the NIA Instrument 1 is deemed as an extension of the NSA Act, deriving its authority from Section 6 of the NSA Act, which gives the president the power to issue Instruments regarding the operations and structures of NIA, State Security Service, and Defence Intelligence Agency.
The Section says “the President may by an instrument under his hand make provisions with respect to” “the structure of each of the agencies.., the manner in which each of the agencies is to be administered, and the manner in which the powers of each of the agencies is to be exercised”, amongst other matters.
The NIA Instrument 1 was issued in 1999 by former military head of state, Abdusalam Abubakar, and incorporated into the NSA Act.
Warnings
Despite these provisions, Nigerians have in the past weeks intensely debated the legal and ethical implications of investigating an intelligence agency linked to a huge amount of cash stashed in a private property.
Late April, a former Minister of External Affairs, Bolaji Akinyemi, advised President Muhammadu Buhari to exercise caution in exposing the NIA to external investigation.
“External Intelligence operations do not belong into the same security genre as domestic security forces such as the SSS, EFCC and the Police,” Mr. Akinyemi said.
As minister between 1985 and 1987, Mr. Akinyemi oversaw the activities of the NIA before the agency was restructured and placed under the supervision of the Office of the National Security Adviser.
The former Secretary-General of the Commonwealth Secretariat, Emeka Anyaoku, has also spoken against an external investigation, which he said was capable of rubbishing the nation’s capacity to promote a strong foreign policy project.
But several Nigerians have argued that no agency of government expending public funds should be beyond scrutiny.
A presidential probe panel headed by Vice President Yemi Osinbajo has inspected the accounts of the agency and has completed its work.
The panel, which also includes the National Security Adviser, Babagana Monguno; and the Attorney-General Abubakar Malami, had sent two officials from the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation to peruse the accounts of the NIA.
Last week, some security officials, speaking to PREMIUM TIMES, expressed concern about how the statutory privacy of a key security agency was been violated.
“I think we should rethink what is playing out in this case, especially with all former DGs of the NIA, including the longest serving NSA in Nigeria, volunteering to come to Abuja to defend the NIA DG and attempt to save the NIA from destruction. These are the authorities on security in Nigeria,” said a retired security chief closely acquainted with many of the top spy chiefs.
A presidency source confirmed to PREMIUM TIMES that a team of past NIA chiefs had met with all three members of the Osinbajo Panel to table their position.
The EFCC did not respond to request for comments on Monday. The commission’s spokesperson, Wilson Uwujaren, neither answered calls nor respond to a text message, after initially promising to revert within minutes.
Tuesday, 16 May 2017
N13 Billion Ikoyi Cash Haul: EFCC Takes Over NIA's Bank Accounts

Share this with short URL Get Short URL
Related Posts
The House of Representatives on Wednesday suspended Abdulmumin Jibrin, a lawmaker from Kano at the centre of the unfolding budget padding scandal, for 180 legislative days. The House seats three days in a week and this consequently means that Mr. Jibrin’s suspension would last more than a year. In a motion recommended by House Ethics Committee chairman, Nicholas Ossai, and adopted by the whole House, Mr. Jibrin will also not be able to hold any position of responsibility for the span of the current National Assembly. Mr. Jibrin began stirring what experts now described as one Africa’s biggest parliamentary scandals in recent memory on July 21, a day after he was eased out as chairman of the powerful committee. Although the House was taking a two-month recess at the time, Mr. Jibrin remained resolute in his quest to “end the massive corruption in the House.” “My resolve to champion this cause was borne out of patriotism and desire to complement the present administration’s anti-corruption war from the legislative front,” Mr. Jibrin said in an email to PREMIUM TIMES on August 21. Mr. Jibrin said the campaign had earned him “blackmail, propaganda and campaign of calumny” from Mr. Dogara, lawmakers loyal to him and their proxies. The assault had been largely targeted at the Speaker of the House, Yakubu Dogara, and three other principal officers, whose resignation and prosecution he had continued to demand. Mr. Dogara had announced the removal of Mr. Jibrin in a speech he read in plenary on July 20, alleging budget fraud and serial betrayal of trust. To back his allegations against Mr. Dogara, Mr. Jibrin released damning documents to the media. On July 30, the State Security Service sealed the secretariat of the Appropriation Committee in the National Assembly after Mr. Jibrin raised the alarm that Mr. Dogara had allegedly concluded plans to cart away computers and destroy evidence. Mr. Jibrin also visited law enforcement agencies, including the EFCC, the SSS and the police, where he said he personally submitted petitions detailing evidence of fraudulent manipulation of budget by Mr. Dogara, his deputy Yusuf Lasun, House Whip, Alhassan Doguwa, Minority Leader, Leo Ogor, and nine others. After several days of silence, Mr. Dogara succumbed to public demands for him to defend himself and came out with blistering statements denying all the charges against him. Mr. Dogara took specific issue with the ‘budget padding’ catchphrase, saying it was a strange term to use when describing the actions of the legislature. He also said lawmakers could not be probed by law enforcement agencies over any infractions in the National Assembly, but later walked back this statement. At some point, the APC moved to contain the crisis, but its gag order lasted only a weekend. Consequently, lawmakers began openly criticising Mr. Jibrin for allegedly defacing the National Assembly, dealing a major blow to his crusade. Mr. Jibrin’s isolation became even more pronounced after 10 principal officers of the House released a statement backing Mr. Dogara and denouncing Mr. Jibrin. Amongst them was Femi Gbajabiamila, the Majority Leader who many thought would be reluctant to openly back Mr. Dogara. The development sparked speculation that Mr. Jibrin would be suspended upon resumption of the House from recess. The House resumed on September 20 and a lawmaker loyal to Mr. Dogara moved a motion the next day to have Mr. Jibrin probed for allegedly breaching the privileges of the members. Emmanuel Orker-Jev, a lawmaker from Benue, proposed tough sanctions against Mr. Jibrin for the damage his allegations have allegedly wrought on the House. “The image of the House has never been worse than this before. Hon. Jibrin was reckless and the allegations were false. He knew that the allegations were false and scandalous and he had no regards at all to whether the allegations were true or false,” Mr. Orker-Jev said. The House subsequently assigned the matter to its Ethics and Privileges Committee for further investigation and to report back within a week with its findings and recommendations. Mr. Ossai, chairman of the committee, convened the first hearing on the matter September 23, during which Mr. Orker-Jev submitted his allegations against Mr. Jibrin. Mr. Jibrin received an invitation to appear before the committee on Monday. But decided to boycott the hearing, even though his demand that the sitting be thrown open to the public was met by Mr. Ossai. Mr. Jibrin also asked his lawyer, Femi Falana, to seek discontinuation of committee’s actvities in court. Mr. Ossai said Mr. Jibrin’s failure to appear before his “properly and constitutionally constituted committee” was, in effect, a defence. Mr. Jibrin had on Tuesday alleged subjudice saying the committee should not have sat since the matter was in court. Mr. Jibrin’s suspension would see him banned from the premises of the National Assembly in the course of the disciplinary action. He would also not receive salaries or allowances. Some sympathisers of Mr. Jibrin saw his suspension as partisan, draconian and counterproductive. “This show of partisanship and support for Mr. Dogara is condemnable and too severe,” said a political analyst, Gbola Oba. Mr. Oba said Mr. Jibrin had suffered the same fate as Dino Melaye who was suspended in 2010 for breach of members’ privilege. Mr. Melaye is now a senator representing Kogi West. “We knew they would gang up against him as they did against Mr. Melaye,” Mr. Oba said. “This clearly shows that the House has failed to move beyond its counterproductive ways of suspending anyone who challenges the status quo. “If the House were a serious body, serious attention would be given to Mr. Jibrin’s claim so as to foster a thriving democratic experiment within the country.” Hoodlums suspected to be political thugs on Wednesday snatched ballot b
Buhari's Niger Delta Minister, Uguru Usani, Was Indicted In Cross River For Fraud The Minister of Niger Delta Affairs, Mr. Uguru Usani, was indicted for fraud and abuse
Nigerian Senator Dino Melaye Buys N180 million Rolls Royce In The Midst Of Recession . Mr. Melaye, a first-time senator who represents Kogi Central, owns a fleet of luxur
I’ll Expose Nyako If Pushed, Says Governor Bindow Of Adamawa State The governor, who issued the warning in Hausa during a visit to him by members of hi
No Apology For Speaking The Truth- Falana Tells Former CBN Gov. Soludo Prominent Nigerian lawyer, Femi Falana has responded to requests by a former Governo
How Diezani Alison-Madueke Bought Le Meridien Hotel Port Harcourt From Ex-MILAD Anthony Ukpo Diezani Alison-Madueke, Nigeria’s former Petroleum Resources Minister, purchased Por
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Social Media
Popular Posts
-
Kim Kardashian has admitted she already knew on her honeymoon with Kris Humphries that their marriage would fail.
-
A gang of women kidnapped a man and raped him for three days while force-feeding him energy drinks, police said.
-
A hunter claims to have hunted a giant frog dubbed 'Frogzilla',in a pond on a ranch near Batesville, Texas
EmoticonEmoticon